1883 Death Dayanand,1983 BEIRUT US/FRENCH MARINE BARACKS/US EMBASSY BOMBINGS -29-10-2005 BOMBINGS INDIA,26-11-2008 MUMBAI TERROR -9/11/2001 PENTGON-US


L- OF EVIL





A PANEL OF BANIYA NAMES ON:-

















Dear President,

9/11/2001-Terrorist Aggrawal Baniya Samaj-Registered -Agrawal Sabha , Prashant Vihar.No.17836/15.7.1987.

5 YEARS LATIKA RANA IN 1983 AND “L” blast BEIRUT

I, Mamta Dhody do solemnly affirm that I am deposing before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States as per “The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976 “that the 9/11 Terror Attacks on the Pentagon had logistics/financial input by a registered society of Aggrawal Baniyas of Rohini -110085,in front of CRPF School ,under Prashant Vihar Thana , with political support from Britain. They were also party to criminal backing of the LeT in 29-10-2005 -3 blasts in Sarojini Nagar,Paharganj and Govindpuri and 26/11 ,Mumbai Terror attacks.They have criminal affiliation with Arya Samaj of 1875 and Khalistani Terrorists.Please visit this channel:-

http://www.youtube.com/user/chamarBhangiBhaSodhi

and also

http://www.youtube.com/user/MamtaRangoonDhody

My grandfather Shri Nathu Shah Dhody was in 29th Khamaria Ordnance depot as Accounts manager of military cadre and loyal to the cause of Independence from the British.Also a case has been lodged against me for defamation by a criminal nexus of underworld called Sara Medicos ,whose links can also be traced to the British who are party to heinous bomb blasts in India with finance from the Arabs.I have also given an intervention in the Jessica Lal Murder Case of Supreme Court and given the number I.A.9098 of 2007 ,in which there was a severe miscarriage of justice as in :-

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1448612320080814.

Also when there was and “L” made in the building in :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beirut_barracks_bombing

,and the movie Slumdog Millionaire was made ,with even the name of Latika in it,by Britishers as the whole syndicate is of seating Sunni muslim/Arya Samaj converted ,undeserving mentally idiots of British allegiance ,in all the Government jobs of India ,who would work for them due to the blackmail of their original seating in that job.The reference is to Latika Rana –dob-18-2-1977 who is an IVF daughter of my mother Chandrakanta Chopra and BR. Puri Ex.CBI as the whole gamut of breaking up Indian and American homes by illegal IVF ,started in 1938 with the establishment of Henning Larsen and Toubro,whose employee /major shareholder ,my Uncle Shri Pran Dhody was killed by them by heart attack as he refused to be a party to their Builder IVF Bin Laden Family Mafia of Mecca. Please investigate.I would be contacting the American Embassy on same.

Mamta Dhody

 












































The 1983 U.S. embassy bombing was a suicide bombing against the United States embassy in Beirut, Lebanon on April 18, 1983 that killed over 60 people, mostly embassy staff members and United States Marines and sailors. It was the deadliest attack on a U.S.diplomatic mission up to that time, and is seen by some as marking the beginning of anti-U.S. attacks by Islamist groups.

Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the blast with a message “promising not to allow a single American to remain on Lebanese soil … we mean every inch of Lebanese territory. …”[1]

The attack came in the wake of the intervention of a Multinational Force, made up of Western countries, including the US, in the Lebanese Civil War, to try and restore order and central government authority. It also followed the Sabra and Shatila massacre of Palestinian refugees by Lebanese Christian militiamen, and four years after the anti-Western Islamic Revolution in Iran..

World response

President Ronald Reagan on April 18 denounced the “vicious terrorist bombing” as a “cowardly act,” saying, “This criminal act on a diplomatic establishment will not deter us from our goals of peace in the region.” Two envoys, Philip C. Habib and Morris Draper, continued their peace mission in Beirut to discuss Lebanese troop withdrawals with a renewed sense of urgency.

The next day, Ambassador Dillon, who had narrowly escaped injury in the bombing, said: “Paramount among the essential business is our work for the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon.” It is only by securing Lebanese government control over the country “that terrible tragedies like the one we experienced yesterday can be avoided in the future.”

The President of Lebanon, Amine Gemayel, connected with President Reagan on April 18, saying, “The Lebanese people and myself express our deepest condolences to the families of the U.S. victims. The cross of peace is the burden of the courageous.” Meanwhile, Lebanon asked the U.S., France, and Italy to double the size of the peacekeeping force. As of March 16, it numbered about 4,800 troops, including some 1,200 U.S. Marines, 1,400 Italian soldiers, 2,100 French paratroopers and 100 British soldiers.

Iran denied any role in the attack. Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Velayati said, “We deny any involvement and we think this allegation is another propaganda plot against us.”[5]

On April 19, Prime Minister Menachem Begin of Israel sent President Reagan a message of condolence for the embassy bombing. “I write in the name of Israel when I express to you my deep shock at the terrible outrage which took the lives of so many of the American embassy in Beirut yesterday.” Defense Minister Moshe Arens, was quoted by Israeli radio that he told the cabinet the attack “justified Israel’s demands for security arrangements in Lebanon.” Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir called the embassy bombing “shocking” but added that, “In Lebanon nothing is surprising. I think the lesson is simple and understood. The security problems in Lebanon are still most serious, and terrorist organizations will continue to operate there, at times with great success.”

Following the attack, the embassy was moved to a supposedly more secure location in East Beirut. However, on September 20, 1984, another car bomb exploded at this embassy annex, killing twenty Lebanese and two American soldiers.

The use of suicide bombing increased following the incident. Car bombings through the rest of 1983 included attacks against the U.S. and French embassies in Kuwait, the invading Israeli Army HQ in Tyre, and the extremely destructive attacks on the U.S. Marine and French Paratrooper barracks in Beirut on October 23, 1983.

Along with the Marine Barracks bombing, the 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing prompted the Inman Report, a review of overseas security for the U.S. Department of State. This in turn prompted the creation of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and the Diplomatic Security Service within the U.S. State Department. The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) is the parent organization of the U.S. Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). However, both terms are used interchangeably within the State Department and other agencies. Recently multi-agency press releases from the US Attorney’s offices use the technically correct Diplomatic Security Service. The DSS was structured as a law enforcement agency, primarily made up of U.S. Federal Agents. The Bureau of Diplomatic Security, more commonly known as Diplomatic Security, or DS, is the security and law enforcement arm of the United States Department of State. DS is a world leader in international investigations, threat analysis, cyber security, counterterrorism, security technology, and protection of people, property, and information. DS’s mission overseas is to ensure that foreign policy is carried out in a safe and secure environment.

Bureau of Secret Intelligence

U.S. Diplomatic Security of the Department of State was formally established in 1916 under Secretary of State Robert Lansing. The office was headed by a Chief Special Agent, who also carried the title of Special Assistant to the Secretary and reported directly to the Secretary on special matters.

A handful of agents worked out of two locations, Washington, D.C. and New York City, operating on confidential funds from the Secretary’s office. They conducted sensitive investigations, especially on the operations of foreign agents and their activities in the United States. It was known as the Bureau of Secret Intelligence at its inception (1916).

The discovery of a listening device in the Great Seal at U.S. Embassy Moscow was the catalyst for developing countermeasures technology. By the end of the 1950s, hundreds of listening devices planted by foreign intelligence services were found in U.S. embassies. Also during this decade, a special assignments staff was created to investigate possible misconduct and contact with foreign intelligence services by State Department personnel. This staff worked closely with Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and FBI Counterintelligence. Reacting to the crisis in electronic surveillance, SY upgraded its technical security program and began hiring engineers. The assignment of Seabee teams to search for listening devices at U.S. Embassy Moscow and U.S. Embassy Warsaw led to the Seabee program within the Department.

SY assumed responsibility for the security of Department of State domestic facilities, which included information security, building passes, and the physical security of Department of State facilities.

Beginning in the late 1960s, several ambassadors and Department officials were kidnapped or assassinated. These actions highlighted the possible exploitation of U.S. diplomats for political purposes. To meet this new threat, SY increased its protective capabilities.

The rages of terrorism continued, creating a new and increasingly dangerous threat to U.S. citizens and missions abroad, as well as to distinguished visitors to the United States. SY responded to the emerging threat by hiring over a hundred new agents and purchasing vehicles, radios, and other support equipment.

SY published handbooks on terrorism and provided advice for overseas personnel on traveling safely to and from work and how to make their homes safer. SY began to survey U.S. embassies for vulnerability to attack.

Counterintelligence

The Diplomatic Security Service Office of Investigations and Counterintelligence (DS/ICI/CI) conducts a robust counterintelligence program designed to deter, detect, and neutralize the efforts of foreign intelligence services targeting Department of State personnel, facilities, and diplomatic missions worldwide.

The office’s counterintelligence division conducts aggressive counterintelligence inquires and counterespionage investigations with other U.S. Government agencies. Counterespionage investigations are conducted in close coordination with the FBI in accordance with their legal mandates.

The division conducts numerous counterintelligence and security awareness training programs for all U.S. Government personnel requesting or having access to sensitive Department of State facilities and information. All training programs enhance the understanding of both foreign intelligence and espionage threats and countermeasures, and educate employees on the foreign intelligence environment.

The Pentagon


File:The Pentagon US Department of Defense building.jpg

On July 28, Congress authorized funding for a new Department of War building in Arlington, which would house the entire department under one roof,[15] and President Roosevelt officially approved of the Hoover Airport site on September 2.[16] While the project went through the approval process in late July 1941, Somervell selected the contractors, including John McShain, Inc. of Philadelphia, which had built Washington National Airport in Arlington, the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, and the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, along with Wise Contracting Company, Inc. and Doyle and Russell — both from Virginia.[17] In addition to the Hoover Airport site and other government-owned land, construction of the Pentagon required an additional 287 acres (1.16 km2), which were acquired at a cost of $2.2 million.[18] The Hell’s Bottom neighborhood, a slum with numerous pawnshops, factories, approximately 150 homes, and other buildings around Columbia Pike, was also cleared to make way for the Pentagon.[19] Later on, 300 acres (1.2 km2) of land were transferred to Arlington National Cemetery and to Fort Myer, leaving 280 acres (1.1 km2) for the Pentagon.

American Airlines Flight 77

American Airlines Flight 77 was a scheduled U.S. domestic passenger flight fromWashington Dulles International Airport to Los Angeles International Airport. It was the third flight hijacked as part of the September 11 attacks and was deliberately crashed into the Pentagon. The aircraft was hijacked by five Islamic extremists less than 35 minutes into the flight. The hijackers stormed the cockpit and forced the passengers to the rear of the aircraft. Hani Hanjour, one of the hijackers who was trained as a pilot, assumed control of the flight. Unknown to the hijackers, passengers aboard were able to make calls by phone to loved ones and relay information on the hijacking.

The aircraft crashed into the western side of the Pentagon at 09:37 am EDT. All 64 people on board the aircraft, including the hijackers, and 125 in the building were killed. Dozens of people witnessed the crash and news sources began reporting on the incident within minutes. The impact severely damaged an area of the Pentagon and ignited a large fire. A portion of the Pentagon collapsed and firefighters spent days trying to fully extinguish the blaze. The damaged sections of the Pentagon were rebuilt in 2002, with occupants moving back into the completed areas on August 15, 2002.

The 184 victims of the attack are memorialized in the Pentagon Memorial adjacent to the Pentagon. The 1.93-acre (7,800 m2) park consists of 184 benches, one for each of the victims, arranged according to the year of birth, ranging from 1930 (age 71) to 1998 (age 3). Flight 77′s flightpath cuts directly through the park.

On May 21, 2001, Hanjour rented a room in Paterson, New Jersey, where he stayed with other hijackers through the end of August.[9] The last Flight 77 “muscle” hijacker, Salem al-Hazmi, arrived on June 29, 2001, with Flight 11 hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari at John F. Kennedy International Airport from the United Arab Emirates and stayed with Hanjour.[8] Hani Hanjour received ground instruction and did practice flights at Air Fleet Training Systems in Teterboro, New Jersey, and at Caldwell Flight Academy in Fairfield, New Jersey.

The American Airlines Flight 77 aircraft was a Boeing 757-223 (registration number N644AA).[14]The flight crew included pilot Charles Burlingame, First Officer David Charlebois, and flight attendants Michele Heidenberger, Jennifer Lewis, Kenneth Lewis, and Renee May.[15] The capacity of the aircraft was 176 passengers, but with 58 passengers on September 11, the load factor was 33 percent. Tuesdays were the least-traveled day of the week, with the same level of load factor seen on Tuesdays in the previous three-months for Flight 77.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, as Flight 77 was 5 miles (8.0 km) west-southeast of the Pentagon, it made a 330-degree turn. At the end of the turn, it was descending through 2,200 feet (670 m), pointed toward the Pentagon and downtown Washington. Hani Hanjour advanced the throttles to maximum power and dove towards the Pentagon. Flight 77, flying at 530 miles per hour (853 km/h)[14] over the Navy Annex Building adjacent to Arlington National Cemetery,[32] crashed into the western side of the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia, just south of Washington, D.C., at 09:37:46, killing all 53 passengers, 5 hijackers, and 6 crew.[33] It clipped five street lampposts and the right wing hit a portable generator before impacting the Pentagon wall.[34][35] The flight hit the Pentagon at the first-floor level.[36] As it crashed, the plane was rolled slightly to the left, with the right wing elevated.[37] When the plane impacted, the front part of the fuselage disintegrated, while the mid and tail sections moved for another fraction of a second, with tail section debris pieces ending furthest into the building.[36] In all, the plane took eight-tenths of a second to fully penetrate 310 feet (94 m) into the three outermost rings[38] and unleashed a fireball that rose 200 feet (61 m) above the building.[36]

Debris from Flight 77 scattered near the Pentagon.

At the time of the attacks, approximately 18,000 people worked in the Pentagon, which was 4,000 fewer than before renovations began in 1998.[39] The section of the Pentagon, which had recently been renovated at a cost of $250 million,[40] housed the Naval Command Center[41] and other Pentagon offices, as well as some unoccupied offices. The crash and subsequent fire penetrated three outer ring sections of the western side. The outermost ring section was largely destroyed, and a large section collapsed. One hundred and twenty-five people in the Pentagon died in the attack.

The Pentagon, minutes after American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into it.

In all, there were 189 deaths at the Pentagon site, including 125 in the Pentagon building and 64 on board Flight 77.




































Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976 is a United States law, codified at Title 28, §§ 1330, 1332, 1391(f), 1441(d), and 1602-1611 of the United States Code, that establishes the limitations as to whether a foreign sovereign nation (or its political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities) may be sued in U.S. courts—federal or state. It also establishes specific procedures for service of process and attachment of property for proceedings against a Foreign State. The FSIA provides the exclusive basis and means to bring a lawsuitagainst a foreign sovereign in the United States. It was signed into law by President Gerald Ford on October 21, 1976.

The FSIA only applies to lawsuits involving a “foreign state.” The FSIA defines “foreign state” to include three entities:

  1. Foreign State
  2. A political subdivision of a foreign state
  3. An “agency or instrumentality” of a foreign state

28 U.S.C. § 1603(a)

“Agency or Instrumentality” is then defined as any entity which:

  1. Has a separate legal identity and
  2. Is either (a) an “organ of a foreign state or political subdivision” or (b) a “majority of whose shares or other ownership interest” is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision. 28 U.S.C. § 1603(b). Although it is unclear precisely what entities qualify as an agency or instrumentality, case law has demonstrated the foreign government agencies (particularly to the extent they perform governmental functions) and foreign government-owned corporations are generally considered to be “Foreign States” on whom the FSIA applies.

  3. Commercial Activity Exception

    The most important exception to sovereign immunity is the commercial activity exception, 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2). That section provides three bases on which a plaintiff can sue a foreign state:

    1. When the plaintiff’s claim is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the U.S. by the foreign state.
    2. When the plaintiff’s claim is based upon an act by the foreign state which is performed in the U.S. in connection with commercial activity outside the U.S.
    3. When the plaintiff’s claim is based upon an act by the foreign state which is performed outside the U.S. in connection with commercial activity outside the U.S. and which causes a direct effect in the U.S.




http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1448612320080814

U.S. court rules Saudi Arabia immune in 9/11 case

NEW YORK |

 

Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:33pm EDT

(Reuters) – The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, four princes and other Saudi entities are immune from a lawsuit filed by victims of the September 11 attacks and their families alleging they gave material support to al Qaeda, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday.

 

The ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld a 2006 ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Casey dismissing a claim against Saudi Arabia, a Saudi charity, four princes and a Saudi banker of providing material support to al Qaeda before the September 11 attacks.

The victims and their families argued that because the defendants gave money to Muslim charities that in turn gave money to al Qaeda, they should be held responsible for helping to finance the attacks.

The appeals court found that the defendants are protected under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

The court also noted that exceptions to the immunity rule do not apply because Saudi Arabia has not been designated a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. State Department.

(Reporting by Edith Honan, editing by Vicki Allen)

 

http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2010/index.htm

The 2010 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) is an annual report by the Department of State to Congress prepared in accordance with the Foreign Assistance Act. It describes the efforts of key countries to attack all aspects of the international drug trade in Calendar Year 2009. Volume I covers drug and chemical control activities. Volume II covers money laundering and financial crimes.

_____________________

* The 2010 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report has been revised since its original posting to the website on March 1; see Volume I [PDF: 2.87MBGet Adobe Acrobat Reader] and Volume II[PDF: 1.60MBGet Adobe Acrobat Reader] as submitted to Congress on March 1. In addition, a supplemental database [PDF: 6.08MBGet Adobe Acrobat Reader; HTML version] was added on May 4 to provide information on money-laundering in a broader range of countries.














































Defeat This Politics of Violence

(A CPI(M) Publication)

August 2009

The Martyrs

The targeting of CPI(M) cadres and their families, most of

whom belong to poor families are often accompanied by naked

brutality.

http://cpim.org/documents/2009-august-bengal%20violence.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/’Ndrangheta

According to Alberto Cisterna of the Italian National Anti-Mafia Directorate, the ‘Ndrangheta has a heavy presence in Canada. “There is a massive number of their people in North America, especially in Toronto. And for two reasons. The first is linked to the banking system. Canada’s banking system is very secretive; it does not allow investigation. So Canada is the ideal place to launder money. The second reason is to smuggle drugs.” Like most organized crime, the ‘Ndrangheta have found Canada a useful North American entry point given its porous ports and proximity to the United States.







A Canadian branch labelled the “Siderno Group” – because its members primarily came from the Ionian coastal town of Siderno in Calabria – is based in Canada at least since the 1950s. Siderno is also home to one of the ‘Ndrangheta’s biggest and most important clans, heavily involved in the global cocaine business and money laundering.[36] Antonio Commisso, the alleged leader of the Siderno group, is reported to lead efforts to import “…illicit arms, explosives and drugs…[37] Elements of ‘Ndrangheta have been reported to have been present in Hamilton, Canada as early as 1911.
United States: The earliest evidence of ‘Ndrangheta activity in the U.S. points to an intimidation scheme run by the syndicate in Pennsylvania mining towns; this scheme was unearthed in 1906.[54] Current ‘Ndrangheta activities in America mainly involve drug trafficking, arms smuggling, and money laundering. It is known that the ‘Ndrangheta branches in North America have been associating with the Italian-American organized crime. The Suraci family from Reggio Calabria has moved some of its operations to the U.S. The family was founded by Giuseppe Suraci who has been in the United States since 1962. His younger cousin, D’Agostino, runs the family in Calabria. This family is known to be extremely ruthless and violent when dealing with their enemies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_Air_Flight_1285

Arrow Air Flight 1285 was a McDonnell Douglas DC-8-63CF jetliner, registered N950JW, which operated as an international charter flight carrying U.S. troops from Cairo, Egypt to their home base in Fort Campbell, Kentucky, via Cologne, Germany and Gander, Newfoundland. On the morning of December 12, 1985, shortly after takeoff from Gander en route to Fort Campbell, the aircraft stalled, crashed and burned about half a mile from the runway, killing all 256 passengers and crew on board.[1]

The accident was investigated by the Canadian Aviation Safety Board (CASB) which determined the probable cause of the crash was the aircraft’s unexpectedly high drag and reduced lift condition, which most likely was due to ice contamination on the wings’ leading edges and upper surfaces.[2] A minority report stated that the accident could have been caused by an onboard explosion of unknown origin prior to impact.

The aircraft was chartered to carry U.S. service personnel, mostly members of the 101st Airborne Division, United States Army, from a six-month deployment in the Sinai, where they had served in the Multinational Force and Observers peacekeeping mission, back to their base in Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The four-engine turbofan aircraft departed Cairo on December 11, 1985 at 20:35 UTC, headed to Fort Campbell via Cologne and Gander.

The aircraft landed at Gander International Airport early in the morning of December 12 at 0905 UTC, where it was refueled and serviced.

Crash sequence

The DC-8 began its take-off roll on runway 22 from the intersection of runway 13 at 06:45 NST/10:15 UTC.[4] It rotated near taxiway “A”, 51 seconds after brake release at an airspeed of about 167 KIAS. The aircraft had difficulty gaining altitude after rotation; the airspeed reached 172 KIAS and began to decrease again, causing the DC-8 to descend. After crossing the Trans-Canada Highway at a very low altitude, the pitch angle increased, but the aircraft continued to descend until it struck down-sloping terrain just short of Gander Lake, and crashed approximately 3,000 feet beyond the departure end of the runway. The aircraft broke up, starting a fire that burned for four hours.

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182

Air India Flight 182 was an Air India flight operating on theToronto-Montréal-London-Delhi-Bombay route. On 23 June 1985, the airplane operating on the route — a Boeing 747-237B (c/n 21473/330, reg VT-EFO) named after Emperor Kanishka — was blown up by a bomb while in Irish airspace, at an altitude of 31,000 feet (9,400 m), and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean. 329 people perished, including 280 Canadian citizens, mostly of Indian birth or descent, and 22 Indians.[1] The incident was the largest mass murder in modern Canadian history. The explosion and downing of the carrier occurred within an hour of the related Narita Airport Bombing.

Investigation and prosecution took almost 20 years and was the most expensive trial in Canadian history, costing nearly CAD $130 million. Only one person was convicted of involvement in the bombing, after pleading guilty in 2003 to manslaughter. The Governor General-in-Council in 2006 appointed former Supreme Court justice John Major to conduct a commission of inquiry and his report was completed and released on 17 June 2010. It was found that a “cascading series of errors” by the Government of Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service had allowed the terrorist attack to take place.

The bomb killed all 22 crew and 307 passengers. Post-accident medical reports graphically illustrated the outcomes of the passengers and crew. Of the 329 persons on board, 131 bodies were recovered; 198 were lost at sea. Eight bodies exhibited “flail pattern” injuries, indicating that they exited the aircraft before it had hit the water. This, in turn, was a sign that the airplane had broken up in mid-air. Twenty-six bodies showed signs of hypoxia (lack of oxygen). Twenty-five bodies, mostly victims who were seated near windows, showed signs of explosive decompression. Twenty-three bodies had signs of “injuries from a vertical force”. Twenty-one passengers were found with little or no clothing.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtriya_Rifles
The Rashtriya Rifles (Hindi: राष्ट्रीय राइफल्स) is a counter-insurgency/anti-terrorist force in India. It is a paramilitary force deployed in Jammu and Kashmir.

The Rashtriya Rifles comprises 63 battalions.

The efficacy of an RR battalion arises from the fact that unlike conventional Army battalions, it has six rifle companies instead of four they possess and has kept its heavy weapons — useless in their sphere of activities — back at their bases.

Originally comprising a total of four Counterinsurgency Forces, each responsible for an area of the Kashmir Valley and Jammu, the RR raised a fifth force ‘Uniform’ in 2003-04.:

  • Counter Insurgency Force (CIF) R / Romeo Force - Rajouri and Poonch
  • Counter Insurgency Force (CIF) D / Delta Force - Doda
  • Counter Insurgency Force (CIF) V / Victor Force - Anantnag, Pulwama and Badgam
  • Counter Insurgency Force (CIF) K / Kilo Force - Kupwara, Baramulla and Srinagar
  • Counter Insurgency Force (CIF) U / Uniform Force - Udhampur and Banihal

  • Recruitment

    The RR was raised as a para-military force and it was envisaged that its personnel , like the Assam Rifles, would consist of regular Army volunteers on deputation, ex-servicemen and lateral inductees from various para-military forces and central police organisations. However, this never happened and the force has consisted only of regular Army officers and Jawans , especially from the various Infantry regiments , like the Rajputana Rifles , Gorkha Rifles , Maratha Light Infantry , Sikh Light Infantry and Sikh Regiment. Both officers and soldiers are sent to the RR on deputation for a period of 2-3 years. RR personnel receive 25% more salary than regular Army personnel , plus additional benefits , that is why it is often a coveted deputation.

     

 

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE

AT TEES HAZARI COURT:DELHI

IN RE : CIVIL SUIT NO. 129/2010

IN THE MATTER OF

M/s Sara Medihome

through –its prop ;Sh Ashish Kashyap

s/o Sh. Amarjeet Kashyap

Shop No.1,

1616,Outram Lane,

Kingsway Camp-110009. Plaintiff

Versus

Ms.Mamta Dhody (Kalra)

D/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Dhody

R/o 1513, Outram Lane,

Mukherjee Nagar,

Delhi-110009. Defendant

Filing of Additional documents

1.Letter to District Judge -Authority in the case.

2.Copy of Compliant to Terror Investigation Special Cell of Delhi Police ,dated 14th September 2010

To,

The District Judge ,

Tees Hazari Courts,

Delhi.

Reference :-Case 129/2010-Civil Suit for Defamation based on Criminal compliant.

1.APPLICATION OF THE DEFENDANT TO THE HONABLE COURT FOR INVESTIGATION OF THE LINKS OF THE PRESENT CASE TO 9/11 ,SEPTEMBER 2001,TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON , IN AMERICA .

2.MAKING OF THE MOVIE –“SLUM DOG MILLIONAIRE” BASED ON SAME WITH REFERENCE TO LATIKA.

3.29-10-2005 TERRORIST BOMBINGS IN GOVINDPURI MARKET IN A BUS.

4.26/11 MUMBAI TERROR ATTACKS.

5.APPLICATION OF THE DEFENDANT TO THE COURT TO FURTHER ORDER INVESTIGATION ON SAME AS THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WERE KILLED.

6.COMPENSATION TO THE TERROR VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES BY BRITAIN.

Reference :-1983 Beirut Barracks bombing of United States Marines in which compensation was awarded by Iran to all the victims of the terror attacks, US citizens in a civil suit filed by them.

Series of airline hijackings and suicide bombings against U.S. targets perpetrated by 19 militants associated with the Islamic extremist group al-Qaeda.

The attacks were planned well in advance; the militants—most of whom were from Saudi Arabia—traveled to the U.S. beforehand, where a number received commercial flight training. Working in small groups, the hijackers boarded 4 domestic airliners in groups of 5 (a 20th participant was alleged) on Sept. 11, 2001, and took control of the planes soon after takeoff. At 8:46 AM (local time), the terrorists piloted the first plane into the north tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. A second plane struck the south tower some 15 minutes later. Both structures erupted in flames and, badly damaged, soon collapsed. A third plane struck the southwest side of the Pentagon near Washington, D.C., at 9:40, and within the next hour the fourth crashed in Pennsylvania after its passengers—aware of events via cellular telephone—attempted to overpower their assailants. Some 2,750 people were killed in New York, 184 at the Pentagon, and 40 in Pennsylvania. All 19 terrorists died.

izbullāh izb Allāh Arabic“Party of God”

Lebanese Shīʿite Islamist organization.

Founded in southern Lebanon in 1982 as a response to Israel’s invasion there, its original goals were to drive Israeli troops out of Lebanon and form a Shīʿite Islamic republic similar to that created by the Iranian revolution of 1979. Its political stance, in the main, has been anti-Western, and its members have been implicated in many of the terrorist activities that were perpetrated in Lebanon during the 1980s, including kidnappings, car bombings, and airline hijackings, a number of which were directed at U.S. citizens. It has purportedly received strong material support from Syria and Iran and throughout the 1990s engaged in an intensive guerrilla campaign against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon.

29th October 2005 Terrorist attacks of Govindpuri, Paharganj and Sarojini Nagar .

26/11- 2008 Attacks in Mumbai on innocent civilian/American/Israel citizens and Police personnel ,all had links with Let ,but the political and financial backings to same were provided by the British .All these terror attacks trace their origin to Palestine Liberation Organization.

However a civil suit for compensation was filed by the US citizens who were harmed by the terrorist bombings in Beirut in 1983.The suit was proved to have Iranian backing and the funding and political support by Iran .The intelligence agencies who have investigated the present case of Sara medicos have failed to link their involvement in a highly criminal drug nexus of Laos in India ,with base in Nu-Life hospital. Sara medicos is not a single organization. The basis to same has been provided by me as to their modus operandi in the e-mail on which the present case is based. .The government school behind the Jhuggis of Kingsway camp has been emptied and left vacant so that the Bangladeshi illegal immigrants to this area can occupy it. Political support has been given by the ruling government.I took photographs of the school and submitted a compliant to the Delhi Education department on 4-9-2008 and also sent it as e-mail to relevant authorities and the press.

However the criminal nexus for the entire drug syndicate as well as illegal IVF and illegal seating in government jobs is no small matter and has the support of Britain. The entire companies of Britain who are functioning in India especially Vedanta, Reliance, Sun Pharma ,HSBC ,Polaris ect as previously specified by me in my answer petition have lent their logistic support to same. Since the CBI alliance with Interpol debars it by rule 3 to investigate, religious, political or military crimes ,I would be submitting the entire file to the American Embassy as well as the FBI to investigate .

Houses number in Mukherjee Nagar, 1499 to 1522 were allotted politically or bought by Arya Samajhis /Jains/Baniyas ,who have a international criminal nexus to Britain and an inauguration plate of September 2001 is on the park in front of house of Jai Durga Niwas symbolizing 9 number ,and the house number is 1511-totally completing the syndicate of terror attacks links of 9/11 in America ,to India.The proof of this assumption lies in the fact that no date has been given in the plate ,which specifies re-building of the park.

As the case has already passed from CBI to Interpol, further investigation by filling the gaps can be mediated only by the FBI and report submitted to the honorable court.I will be doing the needful soon and bringing this to the notice of the court.

Please read the wikipedia article for update on foreign compensation in cases of terrorist attacks.

Quote Wikipedia.

“In the Beirut barracks bombing (October 23, 1983 in Beirut, Lebanon) during the Lebanese Civil War, two truck bombs struck separate buildings housing United States and French military forces—members of the Multinational Force in Lebanon—killing 299 American and French servicemen. The organization Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the bombing, but that organization is thought to have been a nom de guerre for Hezbollah—or a group that would later become part of Hezbollah[1]—receiving help from the Islamic Republic of Iran.[2]

Suicide bombers detonated each of the truck bombs. In the attack on the American Marines barracks, the death toll was 241 American servicemen: 220 Marines, 18 Navy personnel and three Army soldiers, along with sixty Americans injured, representing the deadliest single-day death toll for the United States Marine Corps since the Battle of Iwo Jima of World War II, the deadliest single-day death toll for the United States military since the first day of the Tet Offensive during the Vietnam War, and the deadliest single attack on Americans overseas since World War II.[3] In addition, the elderly Lebanese custodian of the Marines’ building was killed in the first blast.[4] The explosives used were equivalent to 5,400 kg (12,000 pounds) of TNT.

In the attack on the French barracks, the eight-story ‘Drakkar’ building, two minutes after the Marine attack, 58 paratroopers from the 1st Parachute Chasseur Regiment were killed and 15 injured, in the single worst military loss for France since the end of the Algerian War.[5]

The blasts led to the withdrawal of the international peacekeeping force from Lebanon, where they had been stationed since the withdrawal of the Palestine Liberation Organization following the Israeli 1982 invasion of Lebanon.

A smoke cloud rises from the rubble of the bombed barracks at Beirut International Airport.

Location 33°49′45″N 35°29′41″ECoordinates: 33°49′45″N 35°29′41″E

United States Marine Corps barracks, Beirut Airport

33°52′10″N 35°29′17″E

‘Drakkar’ barracks of French1er Régiment de Chasseurs Parachutistes, Ramlet al Baida,Beirut

Date October 23, 1983

6:20 a.m.

Attack type Suicide truck bombs

Death(s) 241 American servicemen

58 French servicemen

6 civilians

2 suicide bombers

Injured 75

Belligerent(s) Attributed to Imad Mughniyah[citation needed]

At around 6:20 a.m., a yellow Mercedes-Benz truck drove to Beirut International Airport, where the1st Battalion 8th Marines under the 2nd Marine Division had set up its local headquarters. The truck had been substituted for a hijacked water delivery truck.[clarification needed] The truck turned onto an access road leading to the Marines’ compound and circled a parking lot. The driver then accelerated and crashed through a barbed wire fence around the parking lot, passed between two sentry posts, crashed through a gate and drove into the lobby of the Marine headquarters. The Marine sentries at the gate were operating under rules of engagement which made it very difficult to respond quickly to the truck. By the time the two sentries had locked, loaded, and shouldered their weapons, the truck was already inside the building’s entry way.

The suicide bomber detonated his explosives, which were equivalent to 5,400 kg (12,000 pounds) of TNT. The force of the explosion collapsed the four-story building into rubble, crushing many inside. According to Eric Hammel in his history of the Marine landing force,

The force of the explosion initially lifted the entire four-story structure, shearing the bases of the concrete support columns, each measuring fifteen feet in circumference and reinforced by numerous one-and-three-quarter-inch steel rods. The airborne building then fell in upon itself. A massive shock wave and ball of flaming gas was hurled in all directions.[6]

The explosive mechanism was a gas-enhanced device, probably consisting of bottled propane,butane, or acetylene, placed in proximity to a conventional explosive such as prima cord, all of which are readily available on the retail market. Despite the lack of sophistication and ubiquity of its component parts, a gas-enhanced device can be a very lethal weapon. These devices are similar to fuel-air or thermobaric weapons, explaining the large blast and damage.[7]

About two minutes later, a similar attack occurred against the barracks of the French 3rd Company of the 1st Parachute Chasseur Regiment, 6 km away in the Ramlet al Baida area of West Beirut. Another suicide bomber drove his truck down a ramp into the ‘Drakkar’ building’s underground parking garage and detonated his bomb, leveling the eight-story building and killing 58 French soldiers. Many of the soldiers had gathered on their balconies moments earlier to see what was happening at the airport[8] It was the worst military loss for France since the end of the Algerian War, 22 years earlier.[9]

[edit]Death toll

Rescue efforts continued for days. While the rescuers were at times hindered by sniper fire, some survivors were pulled from the rubble[clarification needed] and airlifted to the USS Iwo Jima, located offshore, and/or to the hospital at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus or to U.S. and German hospitals in West Germany.[4][10] An 18 year-old local woman was killed after firing several shots at a rescue team nearby.[citation needed]

In the attack on the American barracks, the death toll was 241 American servicemen: 220 Marines, 18 Navy personnel and three Army soldiers. Sixty Americans were injured. In the attack on the French barracks, 58 paratroopers were killed and 15 injured, in the single worst military loss for France since the end of the Algerian War.[5] In addition, the elderly Lebanese custodian of the Marines’ building was killed in the first blast.[4] The wife and four children of a Lebanese janitor at the French building were also killed.[11]

This was the deadliest single-day death toll for the United States Marine Corps since the Battle of Iwo Jima of World War II (2,500 in one day) and the deadliest single-day death toll for the United States military since the 243 killed on January 31, 1968, the first day of the Tet Offensive during the Vietnam War. The attack remains the deadliest single attack on Americans overseas since World War II.[3]

[edit]Motivation

According to some observers a major motivation for the bombing was the ill will generated among Lebanese Muslims, especially Shiʿa living in the slums of West Beirut and around the airport where the Marines were headquartered. They saw the MNF “not as a peacekeeping force but as another faction in the Lebanese war.” U.S. troops particularly were seen as siding with the Maronite Catholics in their domination of Lebanon. Muslim feelings against the American presence were “exacerbated when missiles lobbed by the U.S. Sixth Fleet hit innocent by-standers in the Druze-dominated Shuf mountains.”[12] Moreover, there was a growing feeling of frustration inside the Muslim and Druze community in Lebanon with US direct backing of Israel in the 1982 invasion of Lebanon and other pro-Israeli factions within Lebanon. Furthermore, these factions had been responsible for multiple attacks committed against the Muslim and Druze Lebanese population.[citation needed]

Col. Timothy J. Geraghty, the commander of the Marines in Beirut during the incident, has said that “the Marine and the French headquarters were targeted primarily because of who we were and what we represented;” and that,

It is noteworthy that the United States provided direct naval gunfire support — which I strongly opposed for a week — to the Lebanese Army at a mountain village called Suq-al-Garb on 19 September and that the French conducted an air strike on 23 September in the Bekaa Valley. American support removed any lingering doubts of our neutrality, and I stated to my staff at the time that we were going to pay in blood for this decision.[13]

Other observers offer the same observation, while also recognizing that this is not the popular way to remember history; they also allege that some intellectuals and commentators on this issue have a skewed version of history.[14]

Some analysts believe the Islamic Republic of Iran was heavily involved and that a major factor leading it to participate in the attacks on the barracks was America’s support for Iraq in the Iran Iraq War and its extending of $2.5 billion in trade credit to Iraq while halting the shipments of arms to Iran.[15] A few weeks before the bombing, Iran warned that providing armaments to Iran’s enemies would provoke retaliatory punishment.[16]

[edit]Response

U.S. President Ronald Reagan called the attack a “despicable act”[17] and pledged to keep a military force in Lebanon. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, who had privately advised the administration against ever having stationed U.S. Marines in Lebanon,[18] said there would be no change in the U.S.‘s Lebanon policy. On October 24 French President François Mitterrand visited the French bomb site. It was not an official visit, and he only stayed for a few hours, but he did declare: “We will stay.” U.S. Vice President George H. W. Bush toured the Marine bombing site on October 26 and said the U.S. “would not be cowed by terrorists.”[cite this quote]

In retaliation for the attacks, France launched an airstrike in the Beqaa Valley against alleged Islamic Revolutionary Guards positions. President Reagan assembled his national security team and planned to target the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah militants.[19] A joint American-French air assault on the camp where the bombing was planned was also approved by Reagan and Mitterrand. Defense Secretary Weinberger, however, lobbied successfully against the missions.

In fact, there was no serious retaliation for the Beirut bombing from the Americans,[20] besides a few shellings. In December 1983, U.S. aircraft from the USS John F. Kennedy and USS Independence battle groups attacked Syrian targets in Lebanon, but this was in response to Syrian missile attacks on planes, not the barracks bombing.[citation needed] Multi-service ground support units were withdrawn from Beirut post attack on the Marine barracks due to retaliatory threats.

In the meantime, the attack gave a boost to the growth of the Shi’ite organization Hezbollah. Hezbollah denied involvement in the attacks, but was seen by Lebanese as involved nonetheless as it praised the “two martyr mujahideen” who “set out to inflict upon the U.S. Administration an utter defeat not experienced since Vietnam …”[21] Hezbollah was now seen by many as “the spearhead of the sacred Muslim struggle against foreign occupation”.[cite this quote]

Amal militia leader Nabih Berri, who had previously supported U.S. mediation efforts, asked the U.S. and France to leave Lebanon and accused the U.S. and France of seeking to commit ‘massacres’ against the Lebanese and creating a “climate of racism” against the Shia.[22]Islamic Jihad phoned in new threats against the MNF “pledging that ‘the earth would tremble’ unless the MNF withdrew by New Year’s Day 1984.[23]

The Marines were moved offshore where they could not be targeted. On February 7, 1984, President Reagan ordered the Marines to begin withdrawal from Lebanon. This was completed on February 26, four months after the barracks bombing; the rest of the multinational force was withdrawn by April.

On 8 February 1984, USS New Jersey (BB-62) fired almost 300 shells at Druze and Syrian positions in the Bekaa Valley east of Beirut. Some 30 of these massive projectiles rained down on a Syrian command post, killing the general commanding Syrian forces in Lebanon and several other senior officers. This was the heaviest shore bombardment since the Korean War.[24]

Although New Jersey performed her job expertly[who?] during the intervention in Lebanon some[who?] have criticized the decision to have New Jersey shell Druze and Syrian forces. Members of this camp allege that this action forced a shift in the previously neutral U.S. forces by convincing local Lebanese Muslims that the United States had taken the Christian side;[25] New Jersey’s shells had killed hundreds of people, mostly Shiites and Druze.[26] In his memoir, General Colin Powell (at the time an assistant to Caspar Weinberger) noted that “When the shells started falling on the Shiites, they assumed the American ‘referee’ had taken sides.”[27]

Search for perpetrators

At the time of the bombing, several Shia militant groups claimed responsibility for the attacks, and one, the Free Islamic Revolutionary Movement, identified the two suicide bombers as Abu Mazen and Abu Sijaan.[28]

After some years of investigation the bombing was thought to have been committed by the Lebanese Shia militant militia and political party Hezbollah while it was still “underground,” though opinion is not unanimous. Hezbollah did not formally announce its existence until 1985 when it published a manifesto condemning the West and proclaiming “Allah is behind us supporting and protecting us while instilling fear in the hearts of our enemies.”[29] The U.S. government believes that elements that would eventually become Hezbollah, backed by Iran and Syria, were responsible for this bombing,[30] as well as the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut earlier in April. Hezbollah, Iran and Syria have denied any involvement.

Two years after the bombing, a US grand jury secretly indicted Imad Mughniyah as the mastermind behind the bombing. Mughniyah was never apprehended and was killed by a car bomb in Syria on February 12, 2008.[31]

Lebanese author Hala Jaber claims that Iran and Syria helped organize the bombing which was run by two Lebanese Shia, Imad Mughniyeh and Mustapha Badredeen:

Imad Mughniyeh and Mustapha Badredeen took charge of the Syrian-Iranian backed operation. Mughniyeh had been a highly trained security man with the PLO’s Force 17 . . . Their mission was to gather information and details about the American embassy and draw up a plan that would guarantee the maximum impact and leave no trace of the perpetrator. Meetings were held at the Iranian embassy in Damascus. They were usually chaired by the ambassador, Hojatoleslam Ali-Akbar Mohtashemi, who played an instrumental role in founding Hezbollah. In consultation with several senior Syrian intelligence officers, the final plan was set in motion. The vehicle and explosives were prepared in the Bekaa Valley which was under Syrian control.[32]

Commentators argue that the lack of a response by the Americans emboldened terrorist organizations to conduct further attacks against US targets.[33] Along with the U.S. embassy bombing, the barracks bombing prompted the Inman Report, a review of the security of U.S. facilities overseas for the United States Department of State.

Alleged retaliation

Main article: 1985 Beirut car bombing

On March 8, 1985 a truck bomb blew up in Beirut killing more than 80 people and injuring more than two hundred. The bomb detonated near the apartment block of Sheikh Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, a Shia cleric thought by many to be the spiritual leader of Hezbollah. Although the US did not engage in any direct military retaliation to the attack on the Beirut barracks, the 1985 terrorist bombing was widely believed by Fadlallah and his supporters to be the work of the United States; Sheikh Fadlallah stating that `They sent me a letter and I got the message,` and an enormous sign on the remains of one bombed building reading: `Made in the U.S.A.`” Robert Fisk also claims that CIA operatives planted the bomb and that evidence of this is found in an article in the Washington Post newspaper.[34] Journalist Robin Wright quotes articles in the Washington Post and New York Times as saying that according to the CIA the “Lebanese intelligence personnel and other foreigners … had been undergoing CIA training” [35] but that `this was not our [CIA] operation and it was nothing we planned or knew about.`[36] “Alarmed U.S. officials subsequently canceled the covert training operation” in Lebanon, according to Wright.[37]

[edit]Lessons learned

Shortly after the barracks bombing, American president Ronald Reagan appointed a military fact-finding committee headed by retired Admiral Robert L.J. Long to investigate the bombing. The commission’s report found senior military officials responsible for security lapses and blamed the military chain of command for the disaster. It suggested that there might have been many fewer deaths if the barracks guards had carried loaded weapons and a barrier more substantial than the barbed wire the bomber drove over easily. The commission also noted that the “prevalent view” among U.S. commanders was that there was a direct link between the Navy shelling of the Muslims at Suq-al-Garb and the truck bomb attack.[38]

Following the bombing and the realization that insurgents could deliver weapons of enormous yield with an ordinary truck or van, the presence of protective barriers (bollards) became common around critical government facilities in the United States and elsewhere, particularly in relation to Western civic targets situated overseas.[39]

An article in Foreign Policy titled “Lesson Unlearned” argues that the U.S. military intervention in the Lebanese Civil War has been downplayed or ignored in popular history – thus unlearned – and that lessons from Lebanon are “unlearned” as the U.S. militarily intervenes elsewhere in the world[14]

[edit]Civil suit against Iran

On October 3 and December 28, 2001, the families of 241 servicemen who were killed as well as several injured survivors filed civil suits against Islamic Republic of Iran and the Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [40] In their separate complaints, the families and survivors sought a judgment that Iran was responsible for the attack and relief in the form of damages (compensatory and punitive) for wrongful death and common-law claims for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress resulting from an act of state-sponsored terrorism.[40]

Iran (the defendants) was served with the two complaints (one from Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple, et al., the other from Joseph and Marie Boulos, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey Joseph Boulos) on May 6 and July 17, 2002.[40] Iran denied responsibility for the attack[41] but did not file any response to the claims of the families.[40] On December 18, 2002, Judge Royce C. Lamberth entered defaults against defendants in both cases.[40]

On May 30, 2003, Lamberth found Iran legally responsible for providing Hezbollah with financial and logistical support that helped them carry out the attack.[40][42] Lamberth concluded that the court had personal jurisdiction over the defendants under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, that Hezbollah was formed under the auspices of the Iranian government and was completely reliant on Iran in 1983, and that Hezbollah carried out the attack in conjunction with MOIS agents.[40]

On September 7, 2007, Lamberth awarded $2,656,944,877 to the plaintiffs. The judgment was divided up among the victims; the largest award was $12 million to Larry Gerlach, who became a quadriplegic as a result of a broken neck he suffered in the attack.[43]

The attorney for the families of the victims uncovered some new information, including a National Security Agency (NSA) intercept of a message sent from Iranian intelligence headquarters in Tehran to Hojjat ol-eslam Ali-Akbar Mohtashemi, the Iranian ambassador in Damascus. As it was paraphrased by presiding U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, “The message directed the Iranian ambassador to contact Hussein Musawi, the leader of the terrorist group Islamic Amal, and to instruct him … ‘to take a spectacular action against the United States Marines.’”[44] Musawi’s Islamic Amal was a breakaway faction of the Amal Movement and an autonomous part of embryonic Hezbollah.[45]

Some in the U.S. government continue to hold that culpability in the Marine barracks attack is undetermined. In 2001, former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger stated: “But we still do not have the actual knowledge of who did the bombing of the Marine barracks at the Beirut Airport, and we certainly didn’t then.”[18]

[edit]Mossad conspiracy theory

Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky has accused the Mossad of knowing of the plans for the bombing, but decided against informing the Americans of the attack. According to Ostrovsky, then Mossad head Nahum Admoni decided against informing the Americans on the grounds that the Mossad’s responsibility was to protect Israel‘s interests, not Americans. Admoni denied having any prior knowledge of the attack.[46] Ostrovsky further claimed that among the high level officers of the Mossad there was a view that if the Americans “wanted to stick their nose into this Lebanon thing, let them pay the price.”[47] Benny Morris, in his review of Osrtovsky’s book, wrote that Ostrovsky was “barely a case officer before he was fired; most of his (brief) time in the agency was spent as a trainee” adding that due to compartmentalization “he did not and could not have had much knowledge of then current Mossad operations, let alone operational history.” Benny Morris wrote that the claim regarding the barracks was “odd” and an example of one of Ostrovsky’s “Wet” stories which were “mostly fabricated.”[48]

[edit]Terrorism classification

The bombing was categorised by the United States as an act of terrorism.[49]:191 But according to academic Oded Lowenheim, the U.S. Marines had become allied with the Maronite Christians in Lebanon and were actively engaging in battles, thus waiving their non-combatant status.[49]:191 The U.S. still categorised this attack as an act of terror as it was directed against off-duty servicemen, which the U.S. defines as non-combatants.

[edit]See also

Tyre headquarters bombings, similar attacks against Israeli military posts in Lebanon

Khobar Towers Bombing

Unquote.

To, Dated 14-9-2010.

Messrs.Ajay Enterprises

C/O SHO, cc/Police Commissioner

Mukherjee Nagar Thana, Delhi Police.

Delhi-110009.

Subject :- a)Sara Medihomes :-Relevant Facts

b)Reference:-Central Bureau of Investigation –Interpol –File Number IP-18/133/2009 (8186)-The file is not closed.

c.)International relevant facts on Arya Samajh heinous endeavors as an International Terrorist organization since “The battle honour of ‘Afghanistan 1839′”.

Sir,

This pertains to your action on my e-mail dated Friday ,November 13th 2009.,8:32 am. and the file of Interpol which has been made in this context as above mentioned.

The unsatisfactory report presented by your thana placed in Mukherjee Nagar and responsible for the Mukherjee Nagar tuition centres placing undeserving candidates on Government seats , by virtue of their alliance in either helping in the medical elimination of family members or being egg mothers and second wives to old men is truly pathetic. This is the area where the famous riots of 1984 took place when Indira Gandhiji was murdered for which trials are still being scheduled and one is on 16-9-2010 concerning Mr.Sajjan Kumar.

Below are some facts pertaining to the case number 129/2010 at Tees Hazari ,which Sara Medihome has launched upon me for criminal intimidation of crime reporters be it pubic or the Press. Refer to Page numbers 5,6,7,8 of my reply to court :-

Quote:-

12.That the investigations of the Sikh riots of 1984 which also happened in the area where I reside as well as connection to the Parliament attack Case of 13-12-2001 , did not encompass the fact that Indira Gandhiji was killed under a massive conspiracy against the Indian Government to make Khalistan which took root in 1924 and that the golden Temple was full of Islamic ,Bangladeshi Naxallite Jhuggi dwellers posing as Sikhs due to common beard factor.

13.That I am bringing this in the notice of the honorable court because the root of the present crime too rests in an endeavor to make Khalistan and thus spread massive unrest and vicious ,inhumane and heinous criminal activities on a particular sect called Hindus, killing their women and children as well as alliance with a foreign power called Britain to takeover the administration of India again.

14.That on April 19th ,1995, a federal office building was bombed in Oklahoma City .While the perpetrator was a domestic terrorist, he and his conspirators utilized tactics typical of international terrorists. Events such as these have caused the FBI to create a special “Weapons of Mass Destruction Unit ”;to address foreign and domestic threats associated with such weapons (FBI 1998b). All this because the nexus of this so called small unit is with such people who perpetrate Bomb Blasts in India ,because of Islamic, Khalistani British endeavors.

http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/wiredworld.htm

15.That if a particular caste misuses its democratic religious freedom by the tenets laid down by its texts to perpetrate violence, impinge upon the common good , kill people physically, chemically ,biologically or medically ,threaten the unity and sovereignty of a nation ,their religious rights stand questioned in the courts of law.

16.That a precedent was set by “The Calcutta Koran Petition” –in 1985 to ban the Koran as per its following tenets which were being misused :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Calcutta_Quran_Petition

Psychological terrorism and open killings promoted by Islam.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Qur’an

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_extremist_terrorism

“008.012

YUSUFALI: Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.”

PICKTHAL: When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying): I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger.

SHAKIR: When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

Now murders are being committed by a modus operandi wherein the islamic way of killing people comes through ,primary being the Shivani Bhatnagar murder case of 23-1-1999. She was killed by method of Halal.

http://www.newswatch.in/newsblog/546

17.That if investigative agencies and the vigilant public bring to the notice of the government ,then only laws can be made or such governments and criminals punished who perpetrate violence on a mass scale against innocent women and children by misusing their carvings for illegal sex and money amounting to serious attack on the country’s economy ,to the benefit of Arabs ,like money laundering .What I want to bring home to the court is that religious terrorism is being perpetrated to harm the economy of India and snatch its Independence.”

Unquote.

Quote :- pages number 9, 10.

20.That I gave an intervention in Criminal Appeal 179 /2007,in the Supreme Court of India, for all these purports only and it was not properly investigated ,as the country is in the throes of a massive drive of second marriages and illegal IVF ,mostly by government servants on a large scale ,who are procuring jobs for their second wives in government hierarchy by tuition centers and rented rooms of refugee colonies ,who trace their orientations to Pakistan especially residents of Dera Gazi Khan –symbolic to Qauizi or muslim marriage priest. It was also the basis of Parliament attack case of 13-12-2001 as 13 is the samskara of marriage in Hindus. It was also the basis of the Batla House encounter of 19-9-2008. And as the house number of my house is 1513 ,not without purpose so is the house number of Sara Medicos.1616.,in Outram Lane.All trace their origins to a politically enmeshed hierarchy of crime ,stemming from Britain.

13 being the samskara of marriage and 16 the samskara of death in Hindus, which is being symbolically exploited for perpetrating heinous crime.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Mujahideen

http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/casestatus_new/querycheck_new.asp

That the police officers who investigated the Parliament attack case are dead , both Shri Rajbir Singh and Shri Mohan Chand Sharma and that is the theory of Crime –Cause and Effect –no matter how it was done. And my intervention for Mr.Manu Sharma shows that he is innocent and embroiled for his father’s patriotic endeavors.

Intervention number 9098 of 2007.

Unquote.

Quote :- Page 16,17

Coming to the second point of misuse of symbolism and funding democratic elections the Chagrin begins from the ignominy of the British empire to name Afghanistan as ‘Affghanistan’.The battle honour of ‘Afghanistan 1839′ was awarded to all units of the presidency armies of the East India Company that had proceeded beyond the Bolan Pass, by Gazette of the Governor-General, dated 19 November 1839, the spelling changed from ‘Afghanistan‘ to ‘Affghanistan’ by Gazette of India No. 1079 of 1916, and the date added in 1914.

The British destroyed Indian independence on 23-6-1757 in the Battle of Plassey by making men muslim by second marriages ,selling corruption of money and sex ,and looting houses by corrupt kings and menial servants ,mostly of muslim religion.The most heinous terrorism let loose by complete lawlessness , that is capable of being inflicted by menial class living in squalor and abject poverty , supported by religious tenets of “loot what is not yours” and “women are spoils of war” and “halal the infidels of Islam ‘,the maxim that “God did not save you” ,applied to the hilt. The endeavor was backed by the Church of England and State politically (Doubting Thomas of Syrian Church of 52AD.) in league with Islam, and that is why Christians in India were buried inspite of the fact that Jesus had said “from dust to dust ashes to ashes you shall be.” But this policy threatened even the independence of America ,achieved in symbolic 4-7-1776 ,wherein in 1876 in Washington a massive movement to cremate Christians was initiated to break the alliance of heinous Islam and Church of England. Please read the following book.

Purified by Fire: A History of Cremation in America By Stephen R. Prothero

Unquote.

Quote Page 35 ,36,37

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyderabad_(Sind)_National_Collegiate_Board

I can decifer this language because of my ancestral roots and army intelligence background and subsequent degree in Psychology. It also goes to show how merit is undeserved in India running by names and who is running the country.

Please see the world reaction on the Sarojini Nagar Bomb Blasts ,of 29-10-2005 of number 10 of Id-ul-Adha.In the Parliament attack case too the criminals entered through the 10th gate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/29_October_2005_Delhi_bombings

South Africa – President Thabo Mbeki in a message to President A P J Abdul Kalam expressed condolences on behalf of his government and the people. “The South African government joins the international community in condemning these heinous acts of terrorism, particularly in a country that espouses the principles of democracy and freedom of its people,” he said.

United States – “We condemn these attacks in the strongest possible terms. It is a cowardly act of violence and we hope that the perpetrators are swiftly identified and brought to justice”, a senior State Department official said in Washington.

United Kingdom – British Prime Minister Tony Blair sent a letter of condolence to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

President Thabo Mbeki has clearly used words such as “espouses.”

29.That this language of numbers , colors and names has British roots and modus operandi ,and can be clearly deciphered as it has occurred in a set ,logical reasonable pattern over the years and not escaped the reasoning capacity of the intelligence departments. It is not without meaning that the words “Axis of evil” were used . “Axis of evil” is a term initially used by the former United States President George W. Bush in his State of the Union Address on January 29, 2002 and often repeated throughout his presidency, describing governments that he accused of helping terrorism and seeking weapons of mass destruction. Bush labeled Iran, Iraq and North Korea as the axis of evil.

And 29th January happens to be my Birthday in 1964.When Palestine Liberation Organization was formed on the medical death of Nehruji on 27-5-1964.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil

Bolton: “Beyond the Axis of Evil”

John R. Bolton

On May 6, 2002 future United States UN Ambassador John R. Bolton gave a speech entitled “Beyond the Axis of Evil”. In it he added three more nations to be grouped with the already mentioned rogue states: Libya, Syria, and Cuba. The criteria for inclusion in this grouping were: “state sponsors of terrorism that are pursuing or who have the potential to pursue weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or have the capability to do so in violation of their treaty obligations”. The speech was widely reported as an expansion of the original axis of evil.This clearly refers to a defunct press and the slogan of CNN International. “Beyond Borders”.It is why the Whitehouse is on U-Tube.The entire CNN network is under British and Arab Hegemony.

Unquote .

Please see that the entire jhuggis in front of a “British hair cutting saloon are sponsored by :

1.Britain

2.Mumbai Underworld Abu Salem , currently in high-security Arthur Jail in Mumbai .

[(born 1968) is an underworld don originally from Azamgarh district in Uttar Pradesh, India. He is convicted for the 1993 Bombay serial blasts case and killing of India's music baron Gulshan Kumar in 1997.]

3.Entire Max Hospitals of ANALJEET SINGH (Sikh) and Gangaram Hospitals for illegal organ trade .

4.SARA MEDIHOMES

criminal nexus in the order of hierarchy.

The above are the reasons for :-

1.Operation Blue Star

Operation Blue Star- 3– 6 June 1984 was an Indian military operation ordered by Indira Gandhi, then Prime Minister of India, to remove Sikh separatists from the Golden Temple in Amritsar. The separatists, led by Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, were amassing weapons in that Gurudwara.They killed thousands of innocent army and police soldiers armed with machine guns, anti tank missiles and rocket launchers ,when it was being continuously announced on loudspeakers that the Golden temple had thousands of Bangladeshi terrorists as revenge for Bangladesh war in 1971 and who were presently helping in the making of Khalistan. The army casualities were not even reported in the press. The Longowal group strongly condemned the misuse of the Golden temple . Santji Longowal was several times called on to explain his vision of the aspirations of Sikhs in India: “Let me make it clear once and for all that the Sikhs have no designs to get away from India in any manner. What they want simply is that they should be allowed to live in India as Sikhs, free from all direct and indirect interference and tampering with their religious way of life. Undoubtedly the Sikhs have the same nationality as other Indians.” 11/10/82. On 1 February 1984, Harcharan Singh Longowal claimed that Bhindranwale had suggested to him that motorcycles and arms should be purchased on a mass scale for killing members of a “particular community”.[29] Bhindranwale angrily responded to the allegation, saying “nothing is more farther in my mind than this”.

Faced with imminent army action and with the foremost Sikh political organisation, Shiromani Akali Dal (headed by Harchand Singh Longowal), abandoning him, Bhindranwale declared “This bird is alone. There are many hunters after it”.The bird he referred to here is the symbol of the Palestine Liberation Organization ,a killer terrorist organization responsible for all terror attacks on USA and India. .Same sentences were used by killers of Indira Gandhiji on 31-10-1984 ,that they had sighted an eagle who ordered them to kill an International leader working on Terrorism. These were the reasons of the rioting in 1984 which was politically enmeshed with the same heinous Bangladeshis who were in the golden temple in operation Blue star and inhabit Mukherjee Nagar slums of Dhaka bus-stop named by the ruling government and who killed and looted those Sikhs who supported India and Sant.Longowalji .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harcharan_Singh_Longowal

Punjab Accord – Finally, in March 1985, the leadership of the Akali party began to be released from jail under orders from the new prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. With a view to improving the situation and creating the conditions for a negotiated settlement of Sikh demands, the prime minister’s confidente, Arjun Singh, himself a Punjabi, as the Governor of the state, also relaxed the censorship on the Punjabi press, withdrew army control over certain districts, announced his willingness to institute a judicial enquiry into the November 1984 killings, lifted the ban on the All India Sikh Students Federation and agreed to review the cases of thousands of Sikhs imprisoned since the army’s arrival in Punjab the previous June. Within a few days, the first 53 were released. Less than a month after signing the Punjab accord, Sant Harchand Singh Longowal was shot and killed at the gurdwara in village Sherpur(April 1985), not far from Longowal, Punjab. With his death, the date of the supposed transfer of the capital to Punjab came and went with no effect. Soon, the credibility and goodwill of the agreement lay in ruins.Cashing on the operation Blue Star ,Crores of rupees , were then collected from motivated Sikhs in the name of rebuilding the Golden Temple.

2.Indira Gandhiji murder on 31-10-1985 ,because of Bangladesh quest for West Bengal and Sikhs endeavor to make Khalistan with international help from Britain and Palestine Liberation Organization based in Syria/ Dubai, Saudia Arabia ,England , Canada , Australia and Palestine /Israel .It also had support from ‘Ndrangheta . The ‘Ndrangheta is a criminal organization in Italy, centered in Calabria.

In the 1990s the organization started to invest in the illegal international drug trade, mainly importing cocaine from Colombia.Francesco Fortugno, popular center-left politician and deputy president of the regional parliament, was openly killed by the ‘Ndrangheta on 16 October 2005, in Locri. Demonstrations against the organization ensued, with youthful protesters carrying banderoles of “Ammazzateci tutti!“—”Kill us all!” The government started a large-scale enforcement operation in Calabria and arrested numerous ‘ndranghetisti including the murderers of Fortugno.

In March 2006, the national anti-Mafia prosecutor announced the discovery of a narco submarine in Colombia; it was being constructed on behalf of the ‘Ndrangheta for smuggling cocaine.

The ‘Ndrangheta has recently expanded its activities to Northern Italy, mainly to sell drugs and to invest in legitimate businesses which can be used for money laundering. The mayor of Buccinasco was threatened when he tried to halt these investments; in May 2007 twenty members of ‘Ndrangheta were arrested in Milan.

On 30 August 2007, hundreds of police raided the small town of San Luca, the focal point of the bitter San Luca feud between rival clans among the ‘Ndrangheta. Over 30 men and women, linked to the killing of six Italian men in Germany, were arrested.

In September 2009 ‘Ndrangheta was accused by a former member of the gang of sinking dozens of ships loaded with radioactive waste off the Italian coast and of shipping radioactive waste to developing countries for dumping. Italian anti-organized crime agencies estimated in 2007 that the ‘Ndrangheta has annual revenue of about € 35–40 billion (US$50–60 billion), which amounts to approximately 3.5% of the GDP of Italy. This comes mostly from illegal drug trafficking, but also from ostensibly legal businesses such as construction, restaurants and supermarkets. Prosecution in Calabria is hindered by the fact that Italian judges and prosecutors who score highly in exams get to choose their posting; those who are forced to work in Calabria will usually request to be transferred right away.With weak government presence and corrupt officials, few civilians are willing to speak out against the organization. ‘Ndrangeta groups and Sicilian Cosa Nostra groups sometimes act as joint ventures in cocaine trafficking enterprises. Further activities include skimming money off large public work construction projects, money laundering and traditional crimes such as usury and extortion. ‘Ndrangheta invests illegal profits in legal real estate and financial activities. One group of ‘ndranghetistas discovered outside Italy was in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, several decades ago. They were dubbed the Siderno Group by Canadian judges as most of its members hailed from Siderno.[29]

Magistrates in Calabria sounded the alarm a few years ago about the international scale of the ‘Ndrangheta’s operations. It is now believed to have surpassed the traditional axis between the Sicilian and American Cosa Nostra, to become the major importer of cocaine to Europe. In 2008, the ‘Ndrangheta were tied to the importation of 15 million ecstasy pills to Melbourne, at the time the world’s largest ecstasy haul. The pills were hidden in a container-load of tomato cans from Calabria. Australian ‘Ndrangheta boss Pasquale Barbaro was arrested. Pasquale Barbaro’s father Francesco Barbaro was a boss throughout the 1970s and early 1980s until his retirement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ndrangheta

3.PARLIAMENT ATTACK CASE OF 13-12-2001.

4.Sarojini Nagar Bomb Blast of 29-10-2005 which has links to houses 1499 to 1522 in Outram lane ,especially of Govindpuri Blasts of whose compliant I had lodged in Police headquarters ,as the suspected terrorist Miss Latika Rana of Meerut ,was staying in my house number 1513,as tenant , from October 2004 to December 2005 and thence in house number 1510 (CO-CONSPIRATORS – EVIL MONGIA FAMILY OF GL-ELECTRICALS,Kingsway )till May 2007,whereas she registered her home address as A-22 ,Sector 9,Overseas Apartments,Rohini ,Delhi .110085.

5.Batla House encounter of 19-9-2008.,WHICH KILLED THE CHIEF INVESTIGATING OFFICER OF Parliament attack case (13-12-2001) Shri.Mohan Chand Sharmaji.

Further evidence of Arya Samajh as a crime syndicate of both America and India rests in the change of name of Mr. Alfred Alistair Cooke KBE ,which along with AFFghanistan of 1839 (‘Affghanistan’ by Gazette of India No. 1079 of 1916, and the date added in 1914.) ,further consolidates the long range planning endeavors of Britain , heinous use of symbolism of the 16th Hindu samskara of death ,because of which the name of SARA MEDIHOMES criminal connotation is justified as well as its address of killer 1616 in Outram Lane.The houses in Outram Lane are mostly of Pakistani refugees and the houses allotted were not in alphabetical order ,neither were the people who later on bought these houses for terror ,because of the Bangladeshi jhuggis and Gurudwara of Kingsway camp.The huge house belonging to a Sikh in front of Aggrawal sweets also needs to be investigated .The entire jhuggis is illegal occupation of Red Cross hospital land as well as the Delhi Government has further connived with the criminal set up by breaking a government school behind the jhuggis for them to spread behind the Mukherjee Nagar Thana .For this I have already lodged a compliant with the Delhi government on 4-9-2008.(First page enclosed.).Further to consolidate the heinous use of symbolism of Arya Samajh heinous medical killings for organs and body parts ,in which even graves are not spared , extending from Oswal based Ludhiana in India to New Jersey in America, please visit :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alistair_Cooke

Alfred Alistair Cooke KBE (20 November 1908 – 30 March 2004) was a British/American journalist, television personality and broadcaster.[1] Outside his journalistic output, which included Letter from America and Alistair Cooke’s America, he was well known in the United States as the host of PBS Masterpiece Theater from 1971 to 1992.

Born in Salford, Lancashire, England, his father was a lay Methodist preacher and metalsmith by trade; his mother’s family were of Irish Protestant origin. [2] Originally named Alfred, he changed his name to Alistair when he was 22.(1930)

In 1937, Cooke moved to the United States, starting what was to become a permanent emigration.[citation needed] He became US citizen and swore the Oath of Allegiance on 1 December 1941, six days before Pearl Harbor was attacked. Shortly after emigrating, Cooke suggested to the BBC the idea of doing the London Letter in reverse: a 15-minute talk for British listeners on life in America.

In 1947, Cooke became a foreign correspondent for the Manchester Guardian newspaper (later The Guardian), for which he wrote until 1972. It was the first time he had been employed as a staff reporter; all his previous work had been freelance. He also served as a foreign correspondent for The Times.

In 1968, he was only yards away from Robert F. Kennedy when he was assassinated, witnessing the events that followed.

Later the same year, Cooke was awarded an honorary knighthood (KBE) for his “outstanding contribution to Anglo-American mutual understanding.” Cooke was reportedly happy to accept because in the words of Thomas Jefferson, it did not involve “the very great vanity of a title.” Having relinquished his British citizenship during World War II, he could not be called “Sir Alistair”. For more than 50 years, Cooke lived in a rent-controlled apartment in Manhattan, New York City, outliving several property owners and all fellow tenants.

Cooke died at midnight on March 30, 2004, at his home in New York City. He had been ill with heart disease, but died of lung cancer, which had spread to his bones.[9] He was cremated, and his ashes were clandestinely scattered by his family in Central Park.[10]

On December 22, 2005, the New York Daily News reported that the bones of Cooke and many other people had been surgically removed before cremation by employees of Biomedical Tissue Services of Fort Lee, New Jersey, a tissue-recovery firm.[11] The thieves allegedly sold the bones for use as medical-grade bone grafts.[12] The cancer from which Cooke was suffering had spread to his bones, making them unsuitable for grafts. Reports indicated[13] the people involved in selling the bones altered his death certificate to hide the cause of death and reduce his age from 95 to 85. Michael Mastromarino, a former New Jersey–based oral surgeon,[11] and Lee Cruceta agreed to a deal that resulted in their imprisonment.[14] Mastromarino was sentenced on June 27, 2008, in the Supreme Court in Brooklyn to 18 to 54 years’ imprisonment.[15] The entire story of the theft featured in a documentary aimed at educating the public about modern day grave robbery.

As per above facts PLEASE resume investigation as per Narcotics squad arena.

Thanking You ,

Mamta Dhody

1513,Outram Lane, Mukherjee Nagar,Delhi-9

 


http://shilohmusings.blogspot.com/2006/10/suicide-superpower-martyrdom-as-weapon.html

Since its inception, the Islamic Republic of Iran has used Lebanon as its proving ground for the weaponization of suicide. The first modern suicide attack was Tehran’s November 11, 1982 truck bombing of the Israeli military headquarters in Tyre, Lebanon, in which 141 died. The second was its suicide bombing of the U.S. embassy in Beirut on April 18, 1983, which resulted in 63 deaths. The third was Iran’s suicide truck bombing of the Beirut U.S. Marine barracks on October 23, 1983, which killed 241 and caused the United States to withdraw its troops from Lebanon. Iran’s present defense minister, Mustafa Muhammad Najjar, is believed to have commanded Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps expeditionary force in Lebanon at the time of those bombings.

Iranian willingness to accept nuclear retaliation against itself as a form of martyrdom -or, if that willingness is not actually present, other countries’ belief that it is-will allow Tehran to use the implicit threat of a suicidal first strike to get its way:

We are prepared to nuke you first even though you are certain to respond by nuking us. You, in contrast, are not prepared to nuke us first because we are certain to respond by nuking you. Therefore we need only to possess the ability to nuke you in order to induce you to bend to our will.
The prospect of an Iran that can wield nuclear strategic power without having to launch a single missile, though not as spectacular as the Ahmadinejad-as-All-Four-Horsemen-of-the-Apocalypse scenario, is daunting. The distance from Iran to Saudi Arabia, between which lies Shi’a-populated, oil-endowed southern Iraq, is less than 200 miles. Saudi Arabia’s oilfields are in its Eastern Province, much of whose populace are Shi’ites, who are suppressed by, and hostile to, the House of Saud. The goal of Tehran’s nuclear weapons program is to enable Iran to attain hegemony over the entire littoral of the very aptly named Persian Gulf and, by exercising control of virtually all of the Mideast’s oil reserves, become a global power.

Or die trying.

 















About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: